Papers of John Adams, volume 14

To Wilhem & Jan Willink, Nicolaas & Jacob van Staphorst, and De la Lande & Fynje, 19 December 1782 Adams, John Staphorst, Nicolaas & Jacob van (business) Willink, Wilhem & Jan (business) La Lande & Fynje, de (business)

To Wilhem & Jan Willink, Nicolaas & Jacob van Staphorst, and De la Lande & Fynje

Gentlemen, Paris Decr. 19th. 1782.

Your several Letters I have recd.— The protested Bill ought to be accepted for the Honor of the Drawer.1

Altho’ I have no Authority over the Money in your Hands as You know, yet considering the Circumstances, I should advise You to remit Mr. Grand four hundred thousands of french Livres Tournois, 137besides the four hundred thousands already remitted, for the Interest of the Loan in Holland.2

It would give me great pleasure to communicate to You any Intelligence which might be of use to You, but You know I am connected with several Colleagues, & all of Us with the Ministers of four other Nations, so that it would be improper for me to communicate any thing until others concur, because the Communication of Intelligence may have serious Consequences, which one cannot always foresee—

With great Esteem, I have the Honor to be, / Gentlemen, &c

LbC in John Thaxter's hand (Adams Papers); internal address: “Messs. Wilhem & Jan Willink / Nicholas & Jacob Van Staphorst / & / De la Lande & Fynje”; APM Reel 108.

The reference to the protested bill in this paragraph indicates that JA had received the consortium's letter of 4 Dec., but he had probably also received those of 9 and 12 Dec., all above.

That is, for the interest on the loan guaranteed by France, not that raised by the consortium. See JA's letter to Grand of this date, above.

From Francis Dana, 19 December 1782 Dana, Francis Adams, John

From Francis Dana

Dear Sir Decr: 8th. 1782— [O.S., 19 December N.S.]

I give you a thousand thanks for your short letter of the 8th. of last month which I recd. this morning. I had before received a Copy of the State Paper you mention; the consequences you draw from it relative to the Neutral Powers are clear & beyond all question. I had view'd the matter in the same light which you & Mr: J. view it in, so far as can respect myself. You will see my sentiments on the subject in the enclosed letter, which, after presenting my regards to Mr: J. you are at liberty to show to him.1 You will please to close it and forward it by the first opportunity. As to the matter which has been produced by the advances you speak of, I consider it an oblique measure, and the fruit of the old System. It belonged to another apartment properly, and might have been executed by this day perhaps in that course, and wou'd have been probably an irresistable stimulus, and cleared away all obstacles in another quarter. Having your liberty to mention your name in confidence, I have gone no further than to mention the matter in confidence without your name. and anew to consult my correspondent about a certain step.2 but without any effect: thus one of those occasions whh: shou'd be seized upon in the moment, is gone forever.— I will attend to the business of the order you mention. We have a rumour here that you 138have already adjusted affairs on our part. I beleive it premature because I have no advice of so important a measure from you. May Heaven grant us all reasonable successes. Yours very sincerely

The letter abovementioned goes thrô other hands—

P.S. I have this day recd. two letters from my ward at Stockholm one dated Novr: 28th. the other Decr: 6th. He was then well. He had a fine passage across the Bothnie Gulph, the most difficult part of his route.3 Thô I have not yet recd. an account of his departure ftom Stockholm, yet he is probably by this time much farther advanced on his way.

RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “A Monsieur / Monsieur Adams / Ministre Plenipotentiaire des / Etats-Unis &c / à / Paris”; endorsed: “Mr Dana / 8. Dec. 1782.” Filmed at 8 December.

The “State Paper” was Richard Oswald's commission of 21 Sept., for which see vol. 13:483–485. Dana commented at length on the consequences of Oswald being granted the power to negotiate with the “commissioners of the United States” in his letter of [18 Nov.] to Robert R. Livingston, a triplicate of which he enclosed with this letter to JA (Wharton, Dipl. Corr. Amer. Rev. , 6:54–56; MHi:Francis Dana Letterbooks, Official, 1781–1782).

Charles Olivier de Saint Georges Vérac, the French minister to Russia. In his letter to Livingston of [18 Nov.], Dana wrote at length about his consultations with Vérac over the formal presentation of his credentials to the Russian court. Vérac opposed the undertaking with such intensity that Dana concluded it would be futile to make the attempt until peace was officially concluded.

Both are dated new style, but neither has been found. The London Chronicle of 24–26 Dec. printed a report from Stockholm, dated 3 Dec., that JQA had arrived a few days previously, noting that the “young American” did “not appear to be charged with any political commission” but had “come to purchase iron cannon.” It was likely from that report, or virtually identical ones printed in other London papers, that JA learned of JQA's progress. Writing to JQA on 18 Feb. 1783, JA informed his son that until receiving JQA's letter of 1 Feb. he “had heard nothing of you Since the Beginning of December when you was in Stockholm, and then only by the public Papers” ( AFC , 5:97).