Adams Family Correspondence, volume 10
d1794
I received your two kind Letters of April 19th & 22d I was much gratified by the appointment of mr Jay as Envoy extrodanary. I know not how the President could have made a more judicious choice, but there are Some evil spirits who would fault the measure of heaven & quarrel with the Angle Gabrial were he sent even to declare Peace on Earth, and good will to Men. the Jacobine clubs who watch over the measures of Government, sent their clue to Honest[us], hence the Chronical teams with abuse upon the exe[cut]ive, and clamours against the appointment of [the Chi]ef Justice.1 I have been credibly informd that Austin [li]ves Principally in the Printing office & has seldom quitted it, upon thursdays & Mondays till 12 at Night, or rather upon the Night preeceeding the publishing of the paper— I presume if the senate act with consistancy the Negative upon the non importation resolve will be as full as the vote in favour of sending mr Jay abroad, for I do not see upon what Principal they can vote for the one, and agree to the other. you will see before this Lord Lansdowns & Earl Wycombs speaches in the House of Lords, from which we may gather, that they are consious of the evils committed, and anxious for the concequences—2 after ways and means are devised I hope Congress will rise directly. their resolve respecting the Prohibition of British Manufactors, has already taxd the consumers twenty & thirty pr cent. the rise of all foreign Articles has been very rapid— many failures must be the concequence of the detention of our vessels & the depredations upon our Trade—
upon the 12 of this Month a peice of land upon which the widow 162 vesey formerly lived is to be sold at Auction, 6 Acres. tis expected that you will purchase it. the owner talks [of] a hundred and Eighty pounds for it. as it is to be sold at Auction, I have conversd with dr Tufts who does not think it worth more than ten pounds pr acre. yet to avoid bad Neighbours, he thinks I had better allow it to be bid up to 15 pounds but beyond that he would not advise me to go. I wish I kn[ew] your mind upon it and, whether you will think me distracted [by the] price. the buildings are good for nothing, the land worne out but still I should be loth to have a bad Neighbour there.3 I wish you would inclose to me a card to Gen’ll Lincoln, and ask him to send me the Money if I should purchase it
The trees are very forward & we are like to have upon many of them a full blow, but the Season is dry.
tell Brisler his wife and Family were well to day. I am my most tenderly and affectionatly / Yours
RC (Adams Papers); addressed by JQA: “The Vice-President of the United States / Philadelphia.”; endorsed: “1794 Mr Adams.” Some loss of text where the seal was removed.
The Boston Independent Chronicle, 28 April, reported the news of John Jay’s nomination while simultaneously declaring that it “cannot be reconciled to those principles which seem necessary in a republican government.” In particular, Jay’s position as chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court meant a violation of the separation of branches. The newspaper further accused George Washington of giving “certain characters … a monopoly of favour,” comparing the situation to British “Court favourites.” The article concludes by hoping “that the Senate will have firmness enough to reject a nomination absurd in itself, and which is contrary to the true intent and spirit of our constitution.”
Both William Petty, 2d Earl of Shelburne and 1st Marquis of Lansdowne, and his son, John Henry Petty, Earl Wycombe (1765–1809), spoke on 21 Jan. during the debates over the response to King George’s address in the Houses of Lords and Commons, respectively (Namier and Brooke, House of Commons,
3:270–271;
Parliamentary Hist.,
30:1082–1083, 1098–1100). The Boston Columbian Centinel, 30 April, reprinted portions of these debates, but see
AA to JA, 10 May, below. For more on the parliamentary debates, see
AA2 to JA, 29 April, and note 3, above.
The Adamses did not purchase the land; see AA to JA, 11, 27 May, both below.
I Yesterday dined in Company with M. Talleyrand de Perigord and Mr Beaumez, the former late Bishop of Autun and both Members of the late Constituent assembly in France.1
Talleyrand made the Motion for confiscating the Property of the Clergy: which, has made him so obnoxious to the Court of Vienna, 163 that they have persuaded the British Court to order him out of England although he had been previously obliged to quit France.
There is at present a great Number of Men of Talents in this Country Fugitives from switzerland France &c &c as well as England scotland & Ireland. These will do Us more harm than good, if We are not upon our Guard. I shall be at home by the middle of June, I hope. Thomas is on the Circuit.
tenderly Yours
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “Mrs A.”
Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord and Bon Albert Briois de Beaumez came to the United States in spring 1794 to gain information about business opportunities there, both for themselves and for friends and colleagues back in Europe. Together they traveled through the northern United States as far north as Maine and into western New York. They remained in America until 1796, when Talleyrand returned to France and Beaumez left for India.
Talleyrand (1754–1838) had been the bishop of Autun but renounced his religious appointment to serve in the French revolutionary government and became ambassador to Britain in 1792. He later advised Napoleon on foreign affairs and became one of the most influential European diplomats of his time. Beaumez (1759–1800) had accompanied Talleyrand to London and also served in the French Constituent Assembly. He later became a merchant in India (Talleyrand in America as a Financial Promoter, 1794–96, transl. and ed. Hans Huth and Wilma J. Pugh, N.Y., 1971, p. 5–6, 13, 19–22; Bosher, French Rev.,
p. lviii).